Search for: "People v. Brooks"
Results 441 - 460
of 815
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm
The Law Society Gazette had a piece on the case: “People who live in glass houses shouldn’t make article 8 claims”. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:29 am
Quite a fact pattern here: Constellation Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 22, 2008 Brooks v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:58 pm
From today’s Dejoria v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
Brooks, Billions Saved In Tax [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am
Live Science has examined how the Net Neutrality debate affects people’s Internet. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Powell v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 3:48 pm
, Brookings Sept. 2011)The report of the activities of Special Procedures covering the period from 1 January to 31 December 2014 can be accessed here. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 4:48 pm
Halvi v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 8:51 am
” LaMothe v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement U [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Brooks, B. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Brooks, No. 05-4602, 05-4603, 05-4604, 05-4605, 05-4616 In a drug related prosecution, judgment is vacated and remanded in part where the court erred in declining a request that it give instructions requiring the jury to make an essential threshold determination of drug quantity and establish the penalty range for each individual conspiracy defendant, which resulted in a defendant receiving a sentence in excess of the maximum established by section 841(b)(1)(c). [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Brooks (Docket Report) District Court E D Virginia: Nine year delay does not trigger laches but does preclude award of prejudgment interest: Humanscale Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:51 am
Lewitton v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
