Search for: "People v. Farmer"
Results 441 - 460
of 782
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
United States. 379 U.S. 241 (1964) (commerce power could be used to apply an anti-discrimination statute to an establishment that served people in interstate travel and that could affect national policy); Katzenbach v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 12:49 pm
If no such solution is found, California residents and people worldwide will suffer great harm. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 5:24 pm
” Katz v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:50 am
In Beaumont-Jacques v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 8:30 am
Read the decision at: Matheson, et al, v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Conversely, productive property owned or controlled by individuals, especially where that ownership is not under state control or direction, could be understood as a challenge to the unity of the people and a political threat. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:29 am
What group of people forms patent law's audience? [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:37 am
Some believe that raw milk has a higher nutritional content, is tolerated better by people with certain health conditions and has other health benefits. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 12:14 am
” Book sits in a chair that was once occupied by none other than Miles V. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
Earle, 38 U.S. 519 (1839) and Paul v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
Lubin, 122 F. 240 (1903).See Mazer v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 8:13 am
Miri, who like many readers is an IP enthusiast but not a patent specialist, reflects the concerns of many people who find themselves floating in that strange position of being somewhere between a layman and an expert. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:00 am
Batson, GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: Some farmers from Gaines had a plan. [read post]
21 May 2013, 11:38 am
By Shubha Ghosh Without any surprise, even to those who wrote amici in support of the farmer in Bowman v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am
” In Bullock v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:42 pm
So a 9-0 Supreme Court held today in Bowman v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:10 am
References the Monsanto v. [read post]
