Search for: "People v. Kent" Results 441 - 460 of 627
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
  There were news reports of another footballer obtaining a “Clark Kent” injunction (see the report in the Daily Telegraph). [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:12 am by INFORRM
I feel that people shouldn’t be abusing these super-injunctions. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:31 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgment after a public hearing remains outstanding: El Diwany v Ministry of Justice & the Police, Norway, heard 16 March 2011 (Sharp J). [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:31 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
" Kent Walker, Esquire, explained Google's point of view, and responded to numerous questions throughout the hearing. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:07 am by INFORRM
  At 9.30am, in the case of The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis & anr v Times Newspapers and at 10.00am in the case of Aspion v Daniel. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
March 2011 Law Library Acquisitions ListAfricaKQC772 .K5 2010Statutory recognition of customary land rights in Africa : an investigation into best practices for lawmaking and implementation / by Rachael S. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Colonial archive v. local sites; old works v. present recordings as part of the archive; new relations of control. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:59 am by Steve Hall
Arizona and the 2004 Supreme Court ruling in Schriro v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:19 am by James Bickford
In this weekend’s coverage of the Court: Kent Scheidegger of Crime and Consequences previews Davis v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:53 am by Peter Tillers
If time allows, the Program Committee will review papers by other people for possible presentation at the workshop. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:53 am by Todd Ito
Supreme Courtgranted certiorariin Golan v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:47 am by Eric Turkewitz
New York has successfully been doing this for almost 200 years for verdicts that are unreasonable, since Chief Judge James Kent wrote the following in Coleman v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:32 am by INFORRM
  The full Particulars of Claim can be found on the Jack of Kent blog. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
"People like them because they're natural," Nesbitt said. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:30 am by EEM
New opportunity:EU Migration Law Discussion Group, Oxford [info]- First informal meeting at Worcester College on 24 Feb. 2011 will discuss the recent ECHR ruling, M.S.S. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:38 am by Jeff Gamso
  He may be crazy, but legal crazy is something different.Of course, some people think the legal standards are just fine. [read post]