Search for: "People v. Price"
Results 441 - 460
of 4,804
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2015, 11:57 am
Amazon Category: Product #: Regular price:$ (Sale ends !) [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm
On Nov. 3, the 2nd Court ruled in Kathryn and Jeremy Medlen v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:26 am
Affirming a state appellate court’s decision overturning the trial court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings to the trucking company, the state high court left it to the trial court to determine whether the company in fact misclassified its drivers (People ex rel Harris v Pan Anchor Transportation, Inc, July 28, 2014, Chin, M). [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 2:49 pm
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 5:35 pm
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 7:39 am
Most people familiar with the Court's progression from Bowers v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 3:46 pm
(Loss causation usually means that the defendants' lies inflated a stock's price and brought it back down when the truth came out, producing losses for people who bought the stock in the meantime.) [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:09 pm
Few if any of these questions/issues are new, of course, but I'm curious to hear what people think. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 9:50 am
–Von Der Au v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 11:14 am
For instance, the infamous “Hot Coffee” case (formally known as Liebeck v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:53 am
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), presumption that people who buy securities in an "efficient" market rely on the accuracy of information the market believes and therefore incorporates into the market price of securities. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 8:21 am
”’” People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 11:03 am
This vaguely reminded me of this post: Free-to-Consumers Ad-Supported Website Isn’t Illegally Priced–Cammarata v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 7:41 am
”A contemporary three-bedroomed apartment in Palgrave, one of the newest residential blocks at the V&A Waterfront. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 8:01 am
By resting its decision on Willingham’s mutable/immutable distinction, the panel revives—in fact, expands—a doctrine the Supreme Court invalidated more than twenty-five years ago in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
He is, in other words, threatening me with the cold shoulder as a price for deciding that the best choice for me would be to leave. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
They also cite Sosa v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:43 am
Hood v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 8:44 pm
A lot of attention these days is being focused on the struggles many, many people are enduring selling real estate at a loss, whether the result of mortgage woes or declining market prices, or both. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
It would be difficult for most British people to identify any right that is objectionable (unless, perhaps, they are in favour of the death penalty). [read post]
