Search for: "People v. Sharpe" Results 441 - 460 of 1,378
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Facebook will also launch a new scam ads reporting tool and a dedicated team of people to act upon such reports. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:30 am
But, as the Supreme Court recognized in a landmark 1964 decision, New York Times Company v. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has a similar piece focusing on issues surrounding DNA testing as has the Thomson Reuters Foundation which has noted the increasing trend of people using DNA test kits. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
  Impose duty to monitor the markets they make; compliance of users, the quality and conduct of the people and businesses that use the platform. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The speech focuses on the international role of the ICO, convergence issues and people centric approaches to data. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Litigation is the means by which people in our society sometimes resolve their differences. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am by MATHILDE GROPPO
Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court to hear “serious harm” appeal On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Anor UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux (Respondent) v Independent Print Limited and another (Appellants) UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
That said, even if there is a discernible pattern in how people have appealed to what we might call fixity, I think it is crucial to recognize that changes to the idea of fixity have changed how these arguments operate. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Sims – and in Knick v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 12:52 am
The Court of Appeal clarified in Merck v Merck Sharpe & Dohme [2017] EWCA Civ 1834. that this targeting should be considered on an objective basis. [read post]