Search for: "People v. Standard (1986)" Results 441 - 460 of 645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Charles, 476 U.S. 54, 69, 106 S.Ct. 1697, 90 L.Ed.2d 48 (1986). [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:15 pm by carie
Then, both sides can ask questions and take turns dismissing jurors using what are called peremptory strikes (the number of strikes varies by state, but it is often enough for one side to eliminate all qualified minorities).In a 1986 case, Batson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of The College of Pharmacists of Manitoba v Jorgenson 2019 MBQB 87 Rempel J ordered a Winnipeg pharmacists to pay $150,000 in damages to his regulatory body which he accused of covering up the deaths of 24 indigenous people. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, the People have provided the court with an affidavit of defendant's attorney stating what his standard practice is and was at the time he represented the defendant in this matter. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 6:25 pm by Russell Knight
Mentally disabled people, by definition, cannot swear to allegations under oath as they are not “of sound mind and body. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 5:30 am by Bill Marler
Public Health England, the Food Standards Agency (FSA) and the NHS confirmed that, following a retrospective analysis of Listeria cases that 9 cases including 5 deaths were linked to this Listeria outbreak. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
  That last point requires an unconventional course, such as "Elements," to be able to add value measured both by its contribution to a rigorous standard of substantive quality and a high level of relevance for the integrated program of study leading to a flexible but useful J.D. [read post]