Search for: "People v. Standard (1986)" Results 441 - 460 of 645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 7:46 am by Steve Hall
The standard for competency at execution was set by Ford v Wainwright, a 1986 case in which the Supreme Court said that the Eighth Amendment’s bar against cruel and unusual punishment forbids execution of the “insane. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm by We Don't Judge - We Defend
  The police are paid to arrest people. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:27 am by Steve Hall
The Supreme Court established standards to assess whether severely mentally ill inmates are competent to be executed in a 1986 case, Ford v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:54 am by Steve Lombardi
He was the Wapello County Attorney from 1983 through 1986. ? [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
  If they are actually insane, they cannot be executed, under the Court’s 1986 decision in Ford v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
  As early as 1986, Scalia gave a speech exhorting originalists to “change the label from the Doctrine of Original Intent to the Doctrine of Original Meaning. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:01 pm by Steve Hall
  The question of competency to be executed was addressed in a 1989 Supreme Court case which set the standard for evaluating competency to be executed, Ford v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:37 am by Danielle Citron
  Here is the piece: Last week’s unanimous decision of the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by Duets Guest Blogger
Grade: D Super Bowl XXI 1986 This is not a good logo at all. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am by Steve Hall
Leahy has introduced legislation to update the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, a 1986 law that specifies standards for government monitoring of cell phone conversations and Internet communications. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 12:47 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
  Nor is it about "holy baloney," a line from Haunted Honeymoon, a long-forgotten 1986 film. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
  There’s a 1986 Supreme Court case holding to the contrary, but that was before Ford. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am by Eugene Volokh
We also do not specifically discuss recklessly false statements, though we note that recklessly false statements are generally treated similarly to knowingly false statements under this Court’s “actual malice” standard, New York Times Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Both have different standards for keeping confidential business information accessible by the public. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Michael Smith and I have just filed an amicus brief that I drafted for Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment (AWARE) in the Michigan Second Amendment stun gun case, People v. [read post]