Search for: "People v. Summar" Results 441 - 460 of 2,402
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2021, 12:51 am by Guangjian Tu
[v] Hence, the finality of arbitration award is overall enshrined in England. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 8:05 am
How going insane perfectly summarizes the thinking of "serious" conservatives I don't know.And spare me the claim that your people's thinking is "serious. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 11:44 am by Aziz Huq, Tom Ginsburg, David Landau
In the eastern portion of reunified Germany, lustration under reunification treaty provisions resulted in some 54,926 people being removed or barred from office. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:42 pm by Jamie Markham
This post summarizes published criminal decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals published on November 2, 2021. [read post]
Excluded employees The ETS specifies that the requirements apply only to employees who visit an employer’s indoor locations where other people are present. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:28 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  A few months ago, people like me were saying: "Why are so many people rejecting the Covid vaccine requirements for schools, when we have many vaccine requirements that these people have never resisted? [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Notwithstanding the long-accepted, completely uncontroversial logic of everything that I have summarized above, we know that sometimes the Supreme Court comes along and changes the meanings of constitutional provisions by creatively redefining or ignoring terms. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Notwithstanding the long-accepted, completely uncontroversial logic of everything that I have summarized above, we know that sometimes the Supreme Court comes along and changes the meanings of constitutional provisions by creatively redefining or ignoring terms. [read post]