Search for: "People v. Thompson" Results 441 - 460 of 827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The judge said that it was “of regret when people in public office comment about a person who is involved in a trial which is in progress”. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
This is why the IPKat is happy to host a guest contribution from young IP enthusiast Dorothea Thompson (Davenport Lyons), who reports on a recent story from the US involving names, trade marks and hard rock. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
  Mrs Thompson’s application for permission to appeal is pending before the Court of Appeal. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 10:56 am by Simon Fodden
[Mikisew Cree First Nation v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was held in People v Land, People v Knickerbocker and People v Thompson that by pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his right to seek review of any alleged Rosario or Brady violation. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Donald Thompson
Such misconduct may impair a defendant's due process rights and require a reversal of the conviction (see, e.g., People v Robertson, 12 NY2d 355; People v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554; People v Creasy, 236 NY 205; Napue v Illinois, 360 US 264; Alcorta v Texas, 355 US 28). [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 2:20 am by Jon Gelman
In a case that took six weeks to try after 13 years of litigation, Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge James Kleinberg also will measure the credibility of expert witnesses and their theories in The People of California v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 7:19 pm by Jon Gelman
Jon L.Gelman of Wayne NJ is the author NJ Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson) and co-author of the national treatise, Modern Workers’ Compensation Law (West-Thompson). [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 10:26 am by Venkat
" "Social Media Discovery Case Update and Tips for Those Seeking Discovery" "Social Media Discovery Roundup" "Court Orders Production of Five Years' Worth of Facebook and MySpace Posts – Thompson v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:01 pm by Bexis
Thompson, 478 U.S. 804 (1986), for there being “no impediment” to negligence per se, ignores not only Buckman Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Raffaela Wakeman
 Karl Rove said to Greta Van Susteren on her show yesterday that such efforts are essential to the war on terror: To identify patterns of phone calls between individuals here and individuals abroad, and then you identify the patterns of phone calls inside this country … that allows the intelligence agencies to identify connections between people abroad and people at home. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:23 am
Maybe you are familiar with that case (Thompson v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:36 am by John Elwood
The Court also relisted in Thompson v. [read post]