Search for: "Petit v. Clarke"
Results 441 - 460
of 599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2018, 8:55 am
Clark, 137 S. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:26 pm
See Clark, 578 N.E.2d at 748. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s Sept. 2 decision on United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 8:23 am
Clarke (D-NY) on 11/01/11 Amends the INA with respect to V visa (spouses/children of LPR who come to the United States to wait for completion of immigrant visa process) nonimmigrants to include certain Haitian nationals whose petition for a family-sponsored immigrant visa was approved on or before January 12, 2010. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 5:09 pm
Petition granted.Before AUGUSTUS N. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Hall, No. 09–5731 In a capital habeas matter, the petition for certiorari is granted and the court of appeals' order is vacated and remanded where the court of appeals incorrectly held that the habeas petition, which claimed that petitioner was denied discovery into the issue of whether there had been improper communications between the judge and jury, was procedurally barred based on an insufficient record, contrary to Cone v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Hall, No. 09–5731 In a capital habeas matter, the petition for certiorari is granted and the court of appeals' order is vacated and remanded where the court of appeals incorrectly held that the habeas petition, which claimed that petitioner was denied discovery into the issue of whether there had been improper communications between the judge and jury, was procedurally barred based on an insufficient record, contrary to Cone v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:51 am
In Swire v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:19 pm
Clarke Corp. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 11:28 am
So all we know for sure is that the court hasn’t acted on these petitions; until the dockets are updated, they could be relists, or they could be holds. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
But I should give a trigger warning to readers who are sensitive to discussions of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Act: The petition is not a safe space. ============================================================ Granted Relists Packingham v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
See Zerbst v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:12 pm
- 9th Circuit says No (Arellano v Clark Cty. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
The origin is in a 1971 English divorce case, McKenzie v McKenzie. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 23, 2008 US v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:37 am
See Crawford v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
" U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 23, 2008 Clark v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 9:32 am
Cir. 1982); Clark v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Judge Linn further discussed the Supreme Court's decision to deny petition for certiorari in In re Seagate Technology, L.L.C. [read post]
