Search for: "Petition of Reed"
Results 441 - 460
of 609
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
Patterson broadly permitted a habeas corpus petitioner who prevails in a habeas petition to bring a new challenge to his subsequent sentence (a “liberal” result) in an opinion by Thomas (!) [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:29 pm
Reed, No. 09–559 In a First Amendment challenge to the Washington Public Records Act based on its provision permitting the disclosure of referendum petition signers' names and addresses, the Ninth Circuit's reversal of the district court's preliminary injunction in favor of plaintiffs is affirmed where disclosure of referendum petitions does not as a general matter violate the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:23 pm
Reed: District Court Opinion [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:23 pm
Reed: District Court Opinion [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:29 pm
Reed, 09-559, questioned whether or not the State of Washington could release the names of individuals who had signed a petition to put Referendum 71 on the ballot. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:26 am
Reed concerned a referendum to challenge a gay-rights law in Washington; the petition signers contended that the state’s public records law, which would have allowed release of their names, infringed on their free speech rights. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
Reed, a case about signatures on a referendum petition in the State of Washington. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm
Reed, in which the Court held that petition signatories generally do not have a right to remain anonymous. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:42 am
Reed, Washington Secretary of State, the Supreme Court voted 8-1 that individuals who sign petitions to put referendums on state ballots do not have a privacy right under the First Amendment to keep their name a secret. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 6:26 am
Reed on Election Law. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:42 pm
Reed, No. 09-559. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:26 pm
Reed, -- S.Ct. --, No. 09-559, 2010 WL 2518466 (June 24, 2010): Many interesting things to say about this case upholding the facial validity of disclosure of the names/addresses of people who sign petitions that are placed on the ballot, but I was struck most initially by a bit in the dissent by Justice Thomas: A referendum supported by only one person’s signature is a nullity; it will never be placed on the ballot. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:00 pm
Reed Slip opinion at 7. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:06 pm
Reed, (S. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:45 pm
Reed and Skilling v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:10 am
Reed, (S. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 9:51 am
The case arose over an order to publish the names of those who signed a Washington state petition to overturn a state law [JURIST report] giving same-sex partners the... [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:58 am
Reed. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:46 am
Reed, the Court today rejected a facial First Amendment challenge to the disclosure of names on a petition seeking a ballot initiative. [read post]
