Search for: "Phillips v. No Defendants Named"
Results 441 - 460
of 542
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2010, 7:52 am
This would seem to be consistent, at least on a political level, with the Administration's prior call for DADT to be repealed by Congress.Nevertheless, President Obama seems to have ordered his Justice Department to seek a stay on implementation of Judge Phillips' order in Log Cabin Republicans v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
Lord Phillips MR, giving the judgment of the Court stated:- “We wish, however, to make some brief observations about [Lord Woolf CJ’s guidance in A v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 1:07 am
On the return date, the Defendant did not oppose the continuation of the injunction. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 12:48 pm
Pimstone from Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm
In the case of Police v Slater (14 September 2010) the District Court in Auckland found that Whale Oil had been in breach of name suppression orders made by the Court. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 6:00 pm
Hamptons International Dubai LLC & anr v Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors heard 23 July 2010 (Eady J) Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson) BBC v HarperCollins, heard 31 August and 1 September 2010 (Morgan J) [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
Phillips, 2010 WL 2787644 (N.Y. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:49 pm
(Docket Report) District Court Utah: Defendant’s inadequate data retention policies, loss of source code for patented software did not warrant terminating sanctions for spoliation: Phillip M. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:15 pm
§ 402(d) was, at least not by that name. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:11 am
Ina Shoe Co. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
The case will be heard by a 5 judge bench consisting of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
By virtue of clause 3(6), condition 4 – namely that an honest person could form the opinion on the basis of the facts or material shown by the defendant – would seem to leave out of account countervailing facts known to the Defendant which might well show that the condition was not satisfied. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Other Superior Court judges named Wednesday are: Mark V. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Other Superior Court judges named Wednesday are: Mark V. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
Also, Phillips frequently used Phydea's corporate name in connection with his credit card fraud. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 9:30 am
See McDonald v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
Phillips v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:58 am
When there’s no competitor named (Brand X whitens 40% better!) [read post]
Court Grants Summary Judgment for Insurers Against Former Agent, Seeking Return of STOLI Commissions
1 Jun 2010, 11:43 am
Paulson matter also included as defendants the same agents--Michael Antonello and Thomas Petracek--as in Met Life v. [read post]
