Search for: "Plaintiff(s) v. Defendant(s)"
Results 441 - 460
of 69,850
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2019, 11:29 am
” The jury’s verdict for plaintiff was reversed. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 7:28 pm
Peart v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:43 am
There is substantial prejudice to Plaintiff from [defendant's] late disclosure because [plaintiff's] expert has not assessed [the component] as potentially invalidating art and [plaintiff] is prevented fact discovery or deposing [defendant's] expert on this issue. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:17 am
Plaintiff's motion for sanctions against a defendant who fabricated prior art and "committed fraud on the court" was granted in part. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:21 am
" Masimo Corporation v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 6:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 4:30 am
Lias v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 6:14 pm
In Dennis v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 5:53 pm
In Jackson v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 10:00 pm
Samsung and granted the motion to quash the plaintiff’s subpoena for the defendant’s laptops, refusing the plaintiff’s fallback position to meet and confer and referencing Leave it to Beaver in the process. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
The court granted defendant's motion for a second round of claim construction briefing because of positions plaintiff advanced in other litigation and inter partes review. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
In the case of Drum v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 6:11 am
In Silva v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:24 pm
By Kelsey Clifford On September 7, 2021, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed an action brought by the Republic of Turkey (“Plaintiff”) against two defendants, billionaire Michael Steinhardt and Christie’s (“Defendants”), for the recovery of a millennia-old Antalonian Idol known as the “Guennol Stargazer” offered for sale by […] The post Case Review: Republic of Turkey… [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:47 am
The court granted defendant's motion to compel communications between an NPE plaintiff and its counsel that plaintiff disclosed to the named inventors before plaintiff acquired the exclusive option to purchase the patent-in-suit and rejected plaintiff's work product argument. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
The court followed the Eleventh Circuit’s holding in Lowery v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 5:43 am
Defendants filed a motion to exclude the expert testimony of plaintiff's expert on damages, including both lost profits and a reasonable royalty. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 7:01 am
The court denied defendant's motion for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
The court denied plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings as to defendant's inequitable conduct claim based on the theory that plaintiff buried relevant prior art among 597 other prior art references. [read post]
