Search for: "Plaintiffs"
Results 441 - 460
of 203,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2021, 3:38 pm
The plaintiff asserts that her employer, a dental group, terminated her position because she attempted to become pregnant. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 12:59 pm
Evidently, the plaintiff fell on a partially open brick-paved plaza about seven feet from the exit. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 6:19 am
The negligence action occurred between the plaintiffs and the defendant after the defendant hit a golf cart with her car, potentially injuring the plaintiffs in the process. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 7:25 am
Thus, the Court dismissed claims of the opt-in plaintiffs, but allowed Mr. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 12:28 pm
Easton) the Plaintiff sued for damages as a result of injuries sustained in two collisions. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:48 am
The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:48 am
The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:42 am
§ 285 after plaintiff settled with all 58 defendants before trial. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:25 am
§ 285 because plaintiff's litigation tactics were not unreasonable. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Because the plaintiffs have not shown a likelihood of success on the merits, we affirm the decisions of the district judges....Discussing plaintiffs' Free Exercise claims, the court said in part: [I]f these assertions have merit, there is no record evidence to support them. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:06 am
[I]nformation regarding Plaintiff’s marking policies, procedures, and practices was uniquely in Plaintiff’s possession, but Plaintiff either did not adequately review this material before filing suit, or filed suit knowing that it had not complied with the marking requirement. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 6:17 am
§ 285 because plaintiff's litigation tactics were unreasonable. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 8:29 am
The court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment that it did not infringe plaintiff's media streaming patent in light of plaintiff's statements during inter partes review. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
C-0048-CV-2015-10186.The court awarded the Plaintiff costs and attorney's fees after Plaintiff was forced to file a Petition to Enforce a Settlement that was held up by the Defendant's refusal to accept the Plaintiff's proposed Final Settlement Detail Document designed to provide notice to Medicare of the Settlement.In a detailed Order without Opinion, the Court ordered that the settlement go forth and awarded the Plaintiff costs and attorney's… [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 4:05 am
The court said in part:The exemptions from prosecution for places of religious worship and their owners caused no harm to Plaintiff; if anything, they provided a protection to him. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
The court, while ruling against plaintiffs, said:Defendants should take little comfort in this outcome. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
Plaintiffs appealed the fee award. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 8:13 am
"[W]hen [plaintiff's] own expert declined to state that the twenty products contained phase change materials that would infringe the [patent-in-suit], [plaintiff's] claims against those products ceased to be colorable, and it was vexatious for [plaintiff] not to withdraw the infringement claims then as to those products. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 6:53 am
The court denied defendant's motion to order plaintiffs to remove certain prejudicial statements from their website before the upcoming jury trial. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
The court also found that plaintiffs had not alleged taxpayer standing, and that the standing requirements should not be waived. [read post]
