Search for: "Plessy v. State"
Results 441 - 460
of 464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2012, 4:39 am
We've suffered Dred Scott, Plessy v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 1:36 pm
What was once commonplace and accepted can shift over the course of time (Plessy v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
She notes the historical value of dissents and concurrences in cases such as Plessy v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am
The Supreme Court's unanimous landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Patterson’s family roots lay in the Creole neighborhoods of New Orleans, a community with a long history of opposition to Jim Crow and the place where the Plessy v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:49 pm
Sandford, Plessy v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
While the majority's treatment of the Fourteenth Amendment's history and original meaning was relatively brief, Justice Thomas authored a lengthy concurrence purporting to demonstrate the original meaning of the Equal Protection Clause and why affirmative action programs are inconsistent with the clause.In doing so, Justice Thomas defends a "colorblind" version of equal protection, drawing repeatedly on Justice Harlan's dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:03 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 2:15 pm
With Plessy and Dred Scott, Korematsu is one of the most infamous decisions in the history of the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:52 am
Harlan was 26 years old at the time and young Harlan the slaveholder was quite a different man than Harlan the author of the Plessy v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 4:25 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:01 am
The closures are distributed across eight different states. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:12 am
Will’s editorial in the Washington Post argues that SCOTUS should grant cert in the Fisher v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 8:02 am
The Board of Education,” or “Plessy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am
KJA 2542 P56 2012 Letting and hiring in Roman legal thought : 27 BCE – 284 CE / by Paul J. du Plessis. [read post]
