Search for: "Polite v. Miller"
Results 441 - 460
of 999
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
14.53: Lord Keen QC is discussing the political nature of the Smith Commission in Scotland that led to the Scotland Act and its interaction with the Sewel Convention. 14.46: Lord Keen QC names section 28.8 of the Sewel Convention as the language of “political judgement”. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
This is a live blog of the third day of the hearing of the “Brexit” appeal. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58: The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on whether it has… [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
It is difficult to conceive of a case that better fits this description than R (Miller & Anor) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 5:24 am
The case is styled Secretary of State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 4:36 am
Press 2017).Melissa Murray, Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
Moreover, given the political imperative to determine the case expeditiously and the likely delay which would be caused by a reference to the CJEU, it would seem that the Supreme Court would be extremely reluctant to go that route. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 11:10 am
The resulting class action, Handschu v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:13 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
(See Hurley v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:01 am
The citation is R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 10:27 am
During his time as a teacher he has also argued a number of major cases in state and federal courts, most notably Daubert v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:00 am
Apparently, Douglas Miller sued the state Senate for discrimination, harassment and retaliation after he was fired from a job in Berryhill's district office in Modesto in 2013 (Miller v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Spence, Professor of Law, Politics & Regulation, University of Texas School of Law and McCombs School of Business—Corporate Social Responsibility in the Shale Patch? [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 144 (2006) (likewise); Miller v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
Online communication has become a “basic tool[ ],” Benson, 409 U.S. at 67, of modern life, driving innovation and supplying a widely-used platform for political dialogue. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 7:24 am
Interestingly enough, this deference to the school administration mirrors the Court’s approach to obscenity law in Miller v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 8:27 am
The Supreme Court would later develop obscenity laws further in Miller v. [read post]
