Search for: "Polk v. Polk" Results 441 - 460 of 564
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“An attorney’s conduct or inaction is the proximate [*5]cause of a plaintiff’s damages if ‘but for’ the attorney’s negligence ‘the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits of the underlying action'” (Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 50 [2015], rearg denied 27 NY3d 957 [2016], quoting AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Davis Polk & Wardwell, 30 AD3d 171, 172 [1st Dept 2006], affd 8 NY3d 428 [2007]; see also Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
Tweak the incentives for low-quality patents first – Discussion of ‘Understanding Patent Quality Mechanisms’ by R Polk Wagner (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Innovationpartners) Director Kappos: ‘Patent quality equals granting those claims the applicant is entitled to under our laws’ (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel gets it right about patents (Patent Docs) Patent Buddy releases top 100 law firms list (IP… [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:30 am by Jason Rantanen
Polk Wagner and Lee Petherbridge, Is the Federal Circuit Succeeding? [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 5:55 am
Verret (George Mason University), on Thursday, April 25, 2019 Tags: Conflicts of interest, Disclosure, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Retail investors, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Surveys MFW Compliance in Controller-led transaction Olenik v. [read post]