Search for: "Powell v. Powell"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,949
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2010, 9:00 am
Daniel Walsh of the Advertising Specialty Institute has a very thoughtful and comprehensive article on the litigation background of American Needle v. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 4:02 pm
(It's the fun part of Marbury v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:42 pm
Powell, 469 U.S. 57 (1984), and Dunn v. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 12:00 pm
(See Hetzel v. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 6:54 pm
(Trustee of) v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 7:30 am
California and Paris Adult Theatre v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
HLS’s Dehlia Umunna discusses Powell v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 3:58 pm
Powell, Jr. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of crump v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
” [Administrative Code § 7-201(c)(2)]Seems like RDW tripped up, again.# # #DECISIONW. v New York City Dept. of Transp. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
DeGirolami, Book Review, Stephen v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Healey v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 3:52 am
The issue of whether Powell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Thomas v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:06 am
By Lene Powell, J.D.A federal district court declined to remind the SEC of ethical obligations in connection with statements in an SEC press release. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Implications for Public Administration from Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:31 am
In fact, the author of the majority opinion, Justice Powell, later called McCleskey the one case in which he would like to change his vote. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 11:52 am
Aug. 1, 2022)because “[a] settlement agreement is a contract that is.... binding and conclusive,” and “a court cannot relieve [a party] of [her] choice [to settle] simply because h[er] assessment of the consequences was incorrect,” Powell v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 9:26 am
Hosted by Carpmaels on 28 June from 6PM, Sophie Lawrance (Bristows) and Tess Waldron (Powell Gilbert) will be looking at what these developments mean for UK litigators acting for SEP licensors and licensees in this space. [read post]
