Search for: "Power v. Internal Revenue Service"
Results 441 - 460
of 827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2015, 1:56 pm
Allcontributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent of the law, as IPF is certified as a nonprofitorganization under the Internal Revenue Service Act Section 501(c)(3); federal tax ID 20-0210812. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:56 pm
All contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent of the law, as IPF is certified as a nonprofit organization under the Internal Revenue Service Act Section 501(c)(3); federal tax ID 20-0210812. [read post]
20 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Paranoia About the Internal Revenue Service In a recent three-part series of Verdict columns (here, here, and here), I described the decades-long effort on the part of the Republican Party to demonize the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:31 am
The issue was raised by a New York couple who have been engaged in a running tax dispute with the Internal Revenue Service (Kuretzki v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:57 am
" <> Turlock Irrigation District v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:10 am
TO AVOID DISRUPTION IN YOUR SERVICE PLEASE RENEW BY JUNE 1st All Subscriptions Expire on June 1, 2015 (click here) National / International News <> U.S. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am
Electric Power Supply Association, et al – Supreme Court Docket Electric Power Supply Asso. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
McWane, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 5:42 am
Mattocks v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:27 pm
No, unfortunately, section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code says that "gross income" means "all income from whatever source," including "compensation for services. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:52 am
In Pollock v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
The nine month period corresponded in some situations with the Internal Revenue Code provisions governing qualified tax disclaimers. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
This issue is peculiarly significant because the agency doing the redefining is the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:26 am
Too much water under the bridge at this point (even before we get to see what they do in King v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
In defense, respondent alleged the six-year limitation period provided in the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
The appeals court accepted the Internal Revenue Service’s determination that subsidies are available on federally established exchanges as reasonable, and accordingly rejected the challenge. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm
Dressed in a chocolate-brown pantsuit, Burwell soon made her way to the front row, center bench, of the public gallery to take in the arguments over the Internal Revenue Service regulation. [read post]
