Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 441 - 460 of 55,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2011, 12:18 pm by Prof. Coplan, Karl S.
Recently, the issue of whether CWA § 316(b) requires retrofitting closed cycle cooling at existing power plants as a matter of course made it to the Supreme Court, in Entergy v Riverkeeper. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Jane Chong
For example, Blackman argues that the president’s exclusive recognition power as described by the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 1:48 pm by familoo
Balancing human rights: freedom of expression v private and family life. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:44 am by Lawrence Solum
Part V develops an argument that the different approaches to the spending power reflect an underlying set of structural considerations about federalist structure and shows why this analysis favours one of the two different formulations of the spending power rule after the Affordable Care Act decision. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:01 pm by Paul Caron
John (Jake) Brooks (Fordham; Google Scholar) presents The Sixteenth Amendment And Congress’s Income Tax Power (with David Gamage (Indiana-Maurer; Google Scholar)) at San Diego today as part of its Tax Law Speaker Series hosted by Miranda Fleischer: The upcoming Supreme Court case of Moore v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:04 pm
In some cases this may work just fine, but the difficulties for a spouse in a financially interdependent marriage or common-law relationship when the power of attorney is silent on this issue is illustrated in the case of Sommerville v. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 5:31 am by Environmental Law Prof
On September 11, the Third Circuit (Fuentes, Shwartz, Rosenthal (by designation)) issued a decision in PPL EnergyPlus, LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 7:17 pm by Derek Muller
Most of the opinion is not essential to… Continue reading The post State power and the Term Limits v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Hayley Evans
While some, such as Security Minister Ben Wallace, argue that Tuesday’s ruling in SSHD v. [read post]