Search for: "Price v. District of Columbia" Results 441 - 460 of 506
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2010, 7:49 pm by Carter Ruml
  He started as a claims manager in 1927, and his career grew along with the Company, as it expanded to be a multi-line insurer writing policies in 11 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:38 am by Saraphin Dhanani
Indeed, companies in India and Turkey, like China, have undermined Western sanctions since Russia invaded Ukraine and have thus benefitted from reduced Russian oil prices. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am by Daniel J. Gilman
District Court for the District of Columbia, and Judge Amit Mehta has scheduled closing arguments for May 2024, so it ain’t over until it’s over. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Unfortunately, this price reduction for consumers was partially offset by higher taxes. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
College of American Pathologists, 170 F.3d 53, 55 (1st Cir. 1999) (complaint must plead a “factual predicate concrete enough to warrant further proceedings” as “the price of entry, even to discovery”); George Haug Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Once price becomes a material part of a client's selection criteria, unfortunately, firms have put one foot on an escalator that goes in only one direction. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Cigarette tax rates increased in 39 states and the District of Columbia between 2006 and 2019. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Cigarette tax rates increased in 39 states and the District of Columbia between 2006 and 2017. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:00 am by Ronald Collins
There have been divergent applications of the theory in the same case, as exemplified by Justice Antonin Scalia’s majority opinion and Justice John Paul Stevens’ dissent in District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
A three-judge panel for the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously with the Biden administration and the Ways and Means Committee, ruling against Trump’s arguments against the committee’s authority, his privacy concerns, and his claim that complying with the request would be unconstitutional. [read post]