Search for: "Quick v. Department of Justice"
Results 441 - 460
of 675
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm
In its 2010 decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
Gilles Létourneau, then Acting Assistant Director General, Legislative Affairs, Quebec Department of Justice, who represented Quebec, later President of the LRCC, and a Justice of the Federal Court of Appeal. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm
Placing substantial pressure on such exercise can be akin to "prohibiting" it--or so the Court held in the Sherbert line of cases, anyway (the Reagan Justice Department disagreed (see pp. 17-19) and would have required an actual prohibition). [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Raffaela provided a quick update in Hatim v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
While many are quick to criticize the Justice Department for maintaining a de facto policy that some institutions are too big to jail or take to trial, few have offered a convincing argument for why the perceived benefit of a conviction outweighs its potential costs. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:09 pm
That issue has come up in the two cases the Justices have agreed to hear presenting challenges to the “contraceptive insurance” Rule of the Department of Health and Human Services under Affordable Care Act: No. 13-354, Sebelius v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm
And of course commodification can have bad effects (such as those reflected in the Department's next four policy arguments). [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 11:32 am
” Kennedy asked in a quick follow-up. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 10:46 am
Attorney General and Director of National Security which define the categories of foreign actors that may be targets and include specific targeting and minimization procedures Department of Justice and Office of the Director of National Intelligence conduct on-site reviews of targeting, minimization, and dissemination decisions at least every 60 days Section 215 Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, which amended Title V, Section 501 of the Foreign… [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[1] The quoted phrases are from the Third Circuit in Drax v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version).We have been unpacking what might at first appear to be a rather straightforward inquiry: "what is law?" [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Cully Stimson, meanwhile, offered a quick primer on military justice rules, and their significance for Manning’s case. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:19 pm
Supreme Court in Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:05 pm
Stewart, of the Department of Justice. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:05 pm
., and San Antonio — are quick sequels to the Court’s decision last week in Shelby County v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (Chief Justice Crampton, R. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:27 pm
A quick Google search shows that there is no such thing (although there is a Father Judge High School Hall of Fame and a Louisiana Justice Hall of Fame!). [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:51 am
Department of Justice and FTC will undoubtedly challenge more of them in wake of Actavis. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
Last week, in Federal Trade Commission v Actavis Inc. et Al., the US Supreme Court turned its attention to a fascinating crossroad of IP and competition law, reverse payment settlements. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am
Department of Justice and FTC will undoubtedly challenge more of them in wake of Actavis. [read post]
