Search for: "RECORD v. RECORD"
Results 441 - 460
of 71,932
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2012, 3:10 pm
The Supreme Court relied on cases including Lowe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 11:37 am
In Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:11 am
[Aspen Specialty Insurance Co. v JJ Dormu D.O. case no 8:22-cv-00791 in the US District Court for the District of Maryland] [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:46 am
After receiving a cease-and-desist letter with a settlement offer from the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), Thomas-Rasset refused to settle and made history by becoming the first person accused of online copyright infringement by the RIAA to actually have her case tried before a jury. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 5:10 pm
E.g., Frio v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:26 am
These enumerated offenses, if contained within your record, could potentially keep you from getting your record sealed or expunged. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 12:16 am
Reel-to-reel.JPG Eighth Circuit rules that partially inaudible recordings with a confidential informant may be admitted when the trial court finds that they "provide [the] jury with the ‘gist' of the conversations" so that any inaudible portions do not "render" the tapes untrustworthy as a whole, in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:41 am
I’m not sure whether this argument was advanced in Dolan v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
People v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Katz v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:50 am
Supreme Court ruling in Katz v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:08 pm
Below is a link to the February 6, 2012, oral argument in Capitol Records v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 9:10 pm
People v Batjer, 2010 NY Slip Op 06825 (4th Dept. 2010) “We agree with defendant, however, that the court erred in admitting in evidence certain records of BTS inasmuch as the People failed to establish that the records fall within the business records exception to the hearsay rule (see CPLR 4518 [a]; [...] [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 8:13 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court in Kinsella v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 8:13 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court in Kinsella v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:37 am
Reasons for judgement were released this week (Brooks v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:17 pm
In this week's case (Sidhu v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 7:19 pm
Yesterday, we attended and posted a long summary of the en banc oral arguments in Guggenheim v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:27 pm
Backstrom, and James V. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
People v. [read post]
