Search for: "REID v. Reid" Results 441 - 460 of 1,100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2009, 1:48 pm by Aditya
4) Judicial activism v. judicial restraint. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738 [1985]; Zarin v Reid & Priest, 184 AD2d 385, 386-387 [1992]). [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm by Vercammen Law
 Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated PersonsS.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18) (081916) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 9, 2020ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.Only when, through proper legal procedures, a court determines that a litigant lacks the mental capacity to govern her affairs may the litigant be deprived of the right to decide the destiny of her lawsuit. [read post]
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 10:42 am by Zoe Tillman
Senior Judge John Ferren wrote the opinion, and was joined by then-Associate Judges Inez Reid and Noel Kramer. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 10:30 pm by Paul Cartwright
The court referred to Santam Versekeringsmaatskappy Bpk v Byleveldt 1973 (2) SA 146 (A) and the English case of Parry v Cleaver 1970 A.C. 1, and quoted Lord Reid: “It would be revolting to the ordinary person’s sense of justice, and therefore contrary to public policy, that the sufferer should have their damages reduced so that they could gain nothing from the benevolence of friends or relatives or of the public at large and that the only gainer would be the… [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
In Reid v Covert, the Court held that civilian dependents accompanying the armed forces overseas in time of peace were not triable by court-martial for capital offenses. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 7:11 am
Standard for Invalidity Tested at SCOTUS: In Microsoft Corp. v. z4 Tech., Microsoft argued that z4's patent was invalid under 102(g), and sought a lowered standard of invalidity for art that was not considered by the PTO. [read post]