Search for: "RICHMOND v. STATE" Results 441 - 460 of 1,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm by NL
Particular highlights include: Baroness Hale of Richmond DBE QC, our keynote speaker, who has given a number of significant judgments on housing law cases in the last few years, including Austin v LB Southwark (tolerated trespass); Ali v Birmingham CC (Article 6 and homelessness); Rodriguez v Government of Gibraltar (discrimination in the allocation of housing); Meier v Secretary of State (scope of possession orders); and Pinnock v… [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm by NL
Particular highlights include: Baroness Hale of Richmond DBE QC, our keynote speaker, who has given a number of significant judgments on housing law cases in the last few years, including Austin v LB Southwark (tolerated trespass); Ali v Birmingham CC (Article 6 and homelessness); Rodriguez v Government of Gibraltar (discrimination in the allocation of housing); Meier v Secretary of State (scope of possession orders); and Pinnock v… [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 3:20 am by Amy Howe
”  Six days after Friday’s announcement that the Court will review a challenge to a Texas law imposing additional regulations on abortion clinics in that state, coverage of and commentary on Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Giles Peaker
(The ‘exceptional needs or circumstances’ reference is to Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council (2009) UKHL 7 (our note)). [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:24 pm
Co. of Am., 94 NY2d 330 ["out-of-pocket premium payments [for life insurance policies] would vanish within a stated period of time"]; Monter v Massachusetts Mut. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:33 am
Here is the hypothetical:  Plaintiff hires attorney A to prosecute an action against the State of New York, and does not timely file a notice of claim. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am by INFORRM
The appellants had relied upon the view of May J in Summers v London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames [2018] EWHC 782 (Admin), [2018] 1 WLR 4729, at [24], that the expression “those in the locality” in section 59 of the 2014 Act “must be read to include those who regularly visit or work in the locality, in addition to residents”. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:25 am by Adam Chandler
Finally, at Sentencing Law and Policy, Doug Berman has a post on Tapia v. [read post]