Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE" Results 441 - 460 of 7,588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
The post Friday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
The post Wednesday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 5:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At The Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen summarizes the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
State Bar of Wisconsin, a pending petition “involving attorneys objecting to being compelled to join the Wisconsin state bar and pay fees. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 4:42 am by Edith Roberts
The post Thursday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s opinion in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Atlantic, Matt Ford views Maslenjak v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:21 am by Amy Howe
  Andrew Hamm rounded up early coverage and commentary for this blog. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: Subscript Law offers a graphic explainer for Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
At The Daily Signal, David Breemer explains why the Supreme Court was right to overrule precedent in Knick v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
The post Monday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
The post Monday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Nelson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
The post Friday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” At Quomodocumque, mathematician Jordan Ellenberg takes issue with a claim made at oral argument on behalf of the state of Wisconsin in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]