Search for: "Richard Hasen"
Results 441 - 460
of 679
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2019, 7:37 am
” At Slate, Richard Hasen analyzes the potential unintended consequences of a cert petition, described by counsel Larry Lessig as intended to give the Supreme Court “the opportunity to reflect on the [Electoral College] without it determining an election one way or the other,” should it be granted by the justices this term. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 1:12 pm
Hasen, an election law expert at the University of California, Irvine. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:56 pm
Loyola Richard L. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 5:04 am
At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen reports that, on remand, a federal district court has now struck down the law itself. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:44 am
Adam Liptak of The New York Times reports on a study by Richard Hasen of the University of California, Irvine which found a decline in the number of instances in which Congress overrides the Court’s statutory interpretation. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:40 pm
New 10:40 Justin Levitt, Ilya Shapiro, Rick Hasen, Ellen Katz, Jeffrey Harris and Richard Pildes have posted commentary as part of our online symposium about the decision. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:57 am
Here’s how the excerpt begins: This article is excerpted from Richard L. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:02 pm
Rick Hasen of Election Law Blog and Eugene Volokh of The Volokh Conspiracy provide early commentary. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:34 am
Briefly: In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Richard Hasen looks ahead to the anticipated decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 9:05 am
In other election-related news, Rick Hasen also covers Gary Johnson’s Supreme Court filing regarding his bid to be labeled “Libertarian” on the Ohio ballot; Richard Epstein and John Yoo discuss whether “losing the Supreme Court is reason enough to vote for Donald Trump” on their Law Talk podcast; and Patrick Gregory of Bloomberg BNA considers Ninth Circuit Judge Paul Watford “as a potential Supreme Court nominee of Democratic presidential… [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:27 pm
Richard Hasen , writing at Slate, critiques the finding in the case, which he suggests is "in violation of its usual rule of stare decisis. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:23 am
Kavanaugh’s views on race, executive privilege and whether the Supreme Court ruled correctly in requiring President Richard Nixon to turn over the Watergate tapes are all contained in a trove of material given to the Senate on Saturday. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:15 am
” At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re continues his posts on last Term’s decision in Lexmark International v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:47 am
” At the WLF Legal Pulse, Richard Samp weighs in on the issue of jurisdiction in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Company v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:26 am
For The National Law Journal, Tony Mauro interviews Richard Hasen about Hasen’s “controversial book on [Justice Antonin] Scalia, ‘The Justice of Contradictions,’ … [which] takes a broad view of what [Hasen] sees as the inconsistencies in Scalia’s decision-making. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:31 am
” At Politico, Richard L. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:33 am
” Briefly: At Slate, Richard Hasen argues that contrary to a recent suggestion “that Justice [Antonin] Scalia’s legacy is fading, his legacy only seems to be growing,” asserting that “Justice Neil Gorsuch, the newest Supreme Court justice, has not only pledged fealty to Scalia’s methodology; he has also tried to emulate his snarkiness. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
” Briefly: At the Los Angeles Review of Books, Bob Egelko reviews Richard Hasen’s book, “The Justice of Contradictions: Antonin Scalia and the Politics of Disruption. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
Common Cause, the redistricting case, comes from Josh Gerstein at Politico, Richard Wolf for USA Today, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, and Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, while commentary comes from Rick Hasen at the Election Law Blog. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
Hasen argues that although the decision may look like a win for federalism, it “could shift some power in elections back to the states. [read post]
