Search for: "Rule v. Simon" Results 441 - 460 of 1,344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 13 October 2017 the Court of Appeal (Gross, Simon and Peter Jackson LJJ) handed down judgment in Bukovsky v CPS [2017] EWCA 1529 Civ. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Consistent with its earlier ruling DHL v Chronopost (C-235/09) along with the Combit case referred to in Volume I, the CJEU churned* the issues and confirmed that, notwithstanding the unitary character of an EUTM, a mark that peacefully coexists with an EUTM in one part of the EU can still infringe that same EUTM elsewhere in the EU. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  Last Week in the Courts On 5 October 2017 the Court of Appeal (Gross, Simon and Peter Jackson LJJ) heard the appeal in Bukovsky v CPS. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Max Hill v Mail on Sunday,  A Man v The Gazette (Paisley) Ward v Mail on Sunday. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 1:02 pm by Simon Lester
It sounds like the NAFTA renegotiation is about to get exciting, with proposals on controversial issues such as ISDS, rules of origin, and dispute settlement coming soon. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm by Series of Essays
Patent and Trademark Office’s rejection of Simon Tam’s application to register “The Slants” as a mark for the entertainment services of his rock band. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Hawktalk has said that the recent ruling by the ICO on the Royal Free has exposed the ICO’s weaknesses. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 1:08 am by Jani Ihalainen
The US Supreme Court endeavoured to answer this question once and for all this summer.The case of Joseph Matal v Simon Shiao Tam dealt with a rock band, The Slants, who sought to register their name as a trademark in the US. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Indeed, under the 1992 Supreme Court ruling in Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 1:55 pm by TWiT
Join Simon Tam of The Slants, Mike Keyes, Denise Howell, and Matt Curtis for a special episode discussing SCOTUS's Matal v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am by Guest Contributor
A recent EAT ruling JP Morgan v Ktorza continues a line of decisions which limit the role of employee expectations in the determination of unfair dismissals claims further curtailing the extent to which employees can rely on public law notions or human rights principles to challenge their dismissals. [read post]