Search for: "Russell v. U.s.*"
Results 441 - 460
of 504
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2009, 6:31 am
Opinion below (3d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Case involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Docket: 09-244 Title: United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:05 pm
Rosemeyer v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 7:05 am
[Disclosure: Lawyers associated with Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represent the petitioner in Magwood.] [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:00 am
Culliver (09-158) - originally Conference 11.6 [involves lawyers from Akin Gump and Howe & Russell] United States Defense Department v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 5:23 am
 Citing INS v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:46 pm
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Docket: 09-152 Title: Russell Bruesewitz v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:12 pm
Tomorrow, in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
Texas; Cardinal v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Cases involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Docket: 08-1438; 09-109 Title: Sossamon v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 5:59 pm
Opinion below (Supreme Court of Alaska) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Cases involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Docket: 08-1428 Title: Burkey v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
Section 403(r)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) (21 U.S.C. 343(r)(6)) requires that a manufacturer of a dietary supplement making a nutritional deficiency, structure/function, or general well-being claim have substantiation that the claim is truthful and not misleading. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:51 am
Cases involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Docket: 09-53 Title: Kelley v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
Opinion below (1st Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Cases involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Docket: 08-1403 Title: Daniels v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:24 pm
[Howe & Russell represents the respondent.] [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
See Russell L. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 2:36 pm
Fox, 525 So.2d 518 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), and Russell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
[Howe & Russell represents the petitioner] Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 08-1214 Title: Granite Rock Company v. nternational Brotherhood of Teamsters, et al. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply [Howe & Russell represents the petitioner] Docket: 08-1202 Title: IMS Health, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
(in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America (in support of petitioners) Cases involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Docket: 08-987 Title: Campa v. [read post]
