Search for: "S/V Allegiance" Results 441 - 460 of 796
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2015, 6:20 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
A Canada Revenue Agency employee’s moonlighting activities constituted a serious conflict of interest and, along with his subsequent insubordination, gave the employer sufficient cause to terminate the employee, the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board recently confirmed in Cavanagh v Canada Revenue Agency. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm by Eric Rassbach and Hannah Smith
Colorado Civil Rights Commission and its companion (but not-yet-granted) case Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:53 pm by Eugene Volokh
Today's decision in National Institute of Family & Life Advocates v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:52 am by INFORRM
This provoked seems to have ruffled some feathers in Scotland and provoked an unusual rebuke from the Judicial Office for Scotland which, in a letter to the Guardian, printed today, complained that “the inference that could be drawn from such remarks would appear to be that Lady Smith’s judgment was biased or motivated by her political allegiance. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Today's upcoming argument in Salazar v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:44 am by Kara OBrien
The Court’s Decision The Court’s decision was briskly efficient and focused on the dissonance between the Fifth Circuit’s holding and the Court’s prior decisions, Basic v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:05 am
 That change is visible within the apex organs of the contemporary state system ((Text of A/ES-11/L.1; UN General Assembly Resolution -- "Aggression against Ukraine"; UKRAINE v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:13 am
Jingoism yes, and uncritical nationalism--but patriotism is a part of good citizenship, and my parents didn't flee Communist Vietnam for me to take this country's freedoms for granted. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:51 pm
One can fully accept that political allegiances and the Supreme Court’s own desire to preserve the perception of its legitimacy, which is itself a form of politics, can influence its decisions. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Because there was no writing purporting to create a trust and they took no other legal action to transfer ownership of their property, I believe these parishes merely promised allegiance to the hierarchical national church. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:16 pm
Marty asks whether this provision violates the principles of United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 4:41 am by Jonathan Adler
These are questions that should transcend partisan allegiance. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 10:24 am
Because there was no writing purporting to create a trust and they took no other legal action to transfer ownership of their property, I believe these parishes merely promised allegiance to the hierarchical national church. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 12:43 pm by Kevin Shah
In a decision that expands the First Amendment’s definition of protectable speech, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held in Bland v. [read post]