Search for: "S & a COMPANY v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 18,279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2018, 8:02 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Sykes in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and assigned case number 17-2252. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:21 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals handed down a decision is one of these cases on January 4, 2010. [read post]
13 May 2020, 5:37 am by INFORRM
Daniels v Disney No.18-55635, the plaintiff claimed that the Moodsters, a number of cartoon characters colour coded to emotions, resemble those of characters of Disney and Pixar’s movie Inside Out. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:39 am by Nassiri Law
Dep’t of Defense, December 7, 2015, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit More Blog Entries: Arlington v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 7:57 am by Daily Record Staff
The dispute relates to Command’s unsuccessful attempt to obtain a contract with the United States ... [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 6:31 am by Morse, Barnes-Brown Pendleton
  The plaintiff, City of Providence, challenged the forum selection provision in the defendant’s by-laws, which provision selected the United States […] [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 6:31 am by Morse, Barnes-Brown Pendleton
  The plaintiff, City of Providence, challenged the forum selection provision in the defendant’s by-laws, which provision selected the United States […] [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Because it was in financial difficulty, it sought new investment from the United States. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 7:51 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Estate of Broughton, a case from the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, plaintiff was from Spain and was in the United States as a foreign exchange student. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 6:18 am
In an August 5 holding that could open the door to a new breed of litigation claims involving mutual funds, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“ICA”) creates an implied private right of action that several other courts had previously declined to recognize. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:00 am by Bryan West
The change order in question is a monument to ambiguity, only stating a unit price deduction and the description “work performed by others”. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 3:44 am
As we discussed here, the United States Supreme Court last week ruled that state law claims for failure to include an adequate warning on a pharmaceutical label are not preempted by the federal Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) prior approval of the product’s label. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Chatterjee v CBS, 6:19-CV-212-REW United States District Court, E.D. [read post]