Search for: "S W" Results 441 - 460 of 54,172
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
[W]e reverse the district court’s order granting summary judgment on Lozano’s RLUIPA claims... and vacate and remand for further consideration....The district court held that Lozano failed to demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact on whether the absence of a Muslim-designated unit or dorm violates the Establishment Clause.... [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:59 am
Acquired Distinctiveness: The Board observed that "[w]hen proposed marks are highly descriptive, a statement of use for at least five years, or even longer, is generally insufficient to show acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:19 pm by thomasgalvani
The post Timing of Information Disclosure Statements first appeared on Thomas W Galvani, PC. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
But after it was over, Langstaff ruled against their petitions in his recommendation to the Middle District of Georgia, and the trial judge, W. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:26 pm by The White Law Group
The purported investments included W holdings of Iowa and Excel Performance Management, according to the indictment. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:01 am by David Oscar Markus
That was Sentencing Commission Chair, Judge Carlton W. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am by Amy Howe
Trump cites a law review article by then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who before becoming a judge worked in the George W. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
., Kings Bench, April 16, 2024), a British trial court in an 83-page opinion rejected a Muslim student's challenge to a secular secondary school's Prayer Ritual Policy (PRP) that prevented the student from using part of her lunch break to perform her Duhr prayer. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 3:57 am
RAM Development Associates LLC, Opposition No. 91244891 (April 11, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
And, apparently, there were “issues of fact” in that regard.They sure labored over that.# # #DECISIONS. v 340 W. 12 Realty LLC [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 11:35 am by Eugene Volokh
" In reaching that decision, the court stated, [W]here a party is seeking to intervene in a case for the limited purpose of unsealing judicial records, most circuits have found that "there is no reason to require such a strong nexus of fact or law. [read post]