Search for: "S. R.C. T." Results 441 - 460 of 520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
  Id. at *45-46.But we don’t want just to discuss yucky cases, so we’re bookending Block with another pain pump decision, Prather v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 3:31 pm by MBettman
An entity that manages the daily operations of a community school pursuant to contract with the school’s governing authority is an operator within the meaning of R.C. 3314.02(A)(8)(a). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
”16 The Court continued on to state that R.C. 163.14 requires the jury to assess the damages to rest due “without deductions for general benefits to an owner’s property. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:33 am by MBettman
Double Jeopardy A person can’t be tried or punished twice for the same offense. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 5:07 am by MBettman
State’s Propositions of Law Accepted for Review Proposition 1 Involuntary Manslaughter with a child endangering predicate in violation of R.C. 2903.04 (A) is not the same offense for double jeopardy purposes as Aggravated Murder in violation of R.C. 2901.01(C) or Murder with a Felonious Assault predicate in violation of R.C. 2903.02(B) under the Blockburger “same offense” test. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:42 am by Jaclyn West
But since Andy’s the boss, Dwight couldn’t override him. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 10:28 am
“Başlatılan takip işlemi” ifadesi, tamamlanmış işlemlerin önceki Kanuna, yapılmamış işlemlerin yeni Kanuna; tamamlanmamış usûl işlemlerine yeni Kanunun uygulanacağını düzenleyen Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu m. 448’ten farklı olarak başlatılmış ancak henüz sonuçlanmamış işlemlerin ise önceki Kanuna tâbi olacağı… [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
Gonzalez, doesn’t think so, noting that “the Ohio Supreme Court has not held that a judgment of conviction is rendered void by the imposition of multiple sentences in violation of R.C. 2941.25? [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:58 am by MBettman
Judge Scott Gwin dissented on this point, agreeing with the trial court that the signing bonus is passive income under R.C. 3105.171(B)(4), and thus solely Kuhn’s separate property. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by DaytonDUI
 However, the prohibited concentration for whole blood is a concentration equal to or exceeding .096%, R.C.4511.19(A)(1)(c). [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:31 am by Eugene Volokh
You may wonder just what these terms actually mean: What's a shameful or morbid interest in sex compared to a healthy interest, what is patently offensive and what isn't, how a court is to determine serious value, whether the obscene-as-to-minors test plays out different for an audience of 17-year-olds than 7-year-olds, and more. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 3:30 am
Keszei, the 12th District dismisses Father’s appeal because there’s no final appealable order, although noting “we have serious doubts regarding whether a parent’s expressed intention to vacation with his children in Israel is sufficient to constitute ‘domestic violence’ within the meaning of R.C. 3113.31(A)(1). [read post]