Search for: "S. R.C. T."
Results 441 - 460
of 521
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2010, 5:05 pm
Can I Be Sure I'm Saved by R.C. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 5:05 pm
Can I Be Sure I'm Saved by R.C. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:55 pm
” As I blogged when the court of appeals decision was handed down, that can’t be right: It is a proper part of the lawmaker’s business, it seems to me, to decide the remedies available in lawsuits, and whether the remedies should be discretionary or mandatory, even when the consequence is “unwarranted litigation” and the pressure to give in to plaintiffs. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:38 am
Well, actually, it doesn’t end there. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:38 am
Singleton, he’s entitled to a new hearing, but only “for the limited purpose of the proper imposition of postrelease control pursuant to R.C. 2929.191. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:28 pm
On a non-Virginia note, I also noticed that a 1936 brief in R.C. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 12:43 pm
It's what the professors at the University of Michigan's experimental college — the Residential College (R.C.) [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:06 pm
R.C. 4511.19(a)(1)(b) to (a)(1)(k) make it illegal to operate a vehicle with prohibited concentrations of alcohol in one’s blood, breath, or urine. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 3:21 pm
In Ohio, R.C. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
Dep’t of Corrections, No. 08-11722 (11th Cir 2010) Panel “denied habeas relief to a Florida inmate sentenced to death for the 1983 murder a sailor. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 2:24 pm
The license suspension really doesn’t make sense; the guy wasn’t using his driver’s license to ride the bike! [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Hyster Co., 127 F.3d 649, 653-54 (8th Cir. 1997).Parts of the Third Restatement could apply in Arkansas, but there's a statute, and we don't like courts playing games with product liability statutes.CaliforniaOnce upon a time, California invented strict liability, and it hasn’t adopted either the Second or Third Restatement formulations. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 3:46 am
The appellate court affirmed the defendant's conviction finding that the defense counsel should have struck the Canadian juror if he didn't want him to serve. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
See R.C. 2950.99(A)(1)(a)(iii). [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Dep't of Corr. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 2:51 pm
Learn from this case: Lesson #1: If a prescribed medication impairs your ability to drive, don’t drive.Lesson #2: Don't argue you were following your doctor's advice if you took ten times the prescribed amount. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Slip op. at 2.We’re puzzled why there’s no statute of limitations issue in the case, but apparently there wasn’t – nobody even mentioned it. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
SCOTT {¶ 1} Appellant, Joseph T. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
{¶3} On July 30, 2009, pursuant to a plea deal, appellant entered pleas of guilty to Count 1, rape (R.C. 2907.02(A)(2)) and Count 25, pandering sexually oriented material involving a minor (R.C. 2907.322(A)(1)). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:26 am
Johnson: In [State v. ] Tooson, we cited R.C. 2941.22 rather than R.C. 2941.11. [read post]
