Search for: "SANDS v. STATE" Results 441 - 460 of 1,217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Fellows, 209 So. 2d 454, 458 (Fla. 1968) (applying Canon 12 of the Canons of Professional Ethics, the predecessor to rule 4-1.5(b); Florida Silica Sand Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Fellows, 209 So. 2d 454, 458 (Fla. 1968) (applying Canon 12 of the Canons of Professional Ethics, the predecessor to rule 4-1.5(b); Florida Silica Sand Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:30 am by William Funk
Seminole Rock & Sand Co., in which it stated without citation to precedent or other explanation that, when the meaning of the words in an agency’s regulation are in doubt, “the administrative interpretation . . . becomes of controlling weight unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:02 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
As observers might have predicted from the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Menaker, The Consequences of Corruption in Investor-State Arbitration Alain Pellet, Police Powers or the State’s Right to Regulate Mark Feldman, Denial of Benefits after Plama v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:12 am by Steven Boutwell
This decision created a de facto hard line in the sand, known as the Jensen line, which delineated the precise line of state workers’ compensation coverage at the water’s edge. [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:12 am by Steven Boutwell
This decision created a de facto hard line in the sand, known as the Jensen line, which delineated the precise line of state workers’ compensation coverage at the water’s edge. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Seminole Rock & Sand, which stand for the proposition that courts defer to agencies’ interpretations of their own regulations. [read post]