Search for: "SEALED APPELLANT 1" Results 441 - 460 of 680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Branker, No. 07-8 Denial of habeas petition challenging convictions for the murder of a state trooper and a deputy sheriff is affirmed where: 1) the Supreme Court of North Carolina did not unreasonably apply the clearly established federal law of Batson v. [read post]
DWR’s standards at issue include requirements that all wells: (1) “be located an adequate horizontal distance” from sources of contamination, including suggested distances for certain common types of sources; (2) “where possible…be located up the groundwater gradient from sources of contamination”; (3) “if possible…located outside areas of flooding; and (4) “annular space” is “effectively sealed” and… [read post]
DWR’s standards at issue include requirements that all wells: (1) “be located an adequate horizontal distance” from sources of contamination, including suggested distances for certain common types of sources; (2) “where possible…be located up the groundwater gradient from sources of contamination”; (3) “if possible…located outside areas of flooding; and (4) “annular space” is “effectively sealed” and… [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am by Frank Cranmer
Richard Deadman: “Confession in the Anglican Church – Breaking the Seal? [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 5:06 am by Russell Knight
So, the above judge’s decision to allow testimony was subsequently overruled by the appellate court. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
Pursuant to a Subscription Agreement, the plaintiff invested $1 million for 20% membership interest in an LLC formed to develop and own a chain of poke restaurants. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 2:27 pm by Russell Knight
No single document can possibly seal the fate of an Illinois divorce. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:42 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: Illinois Appellate Court Reinstates Product-Liability Claim Against Distributor $1 Million Settlement Reached for Injury to Elevator Worker Because of Safety Malfunction Medical Device Cases Brightened by Recent U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
Bush v New York State Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, 2010 NY Slip Op 03441, decided on April 27, 2010, the Appellate Division said that requiring Bush to register under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law Article 6-C) does not violate the ex post facto clause of the federal constitution (US Constitution Article I, §10[1]), the due process clauses of the state or federal constitutions (NY Constitution, Article I, § 6; US Constitution, Amendment XIV),… [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Does s. 753(1) preclude sentencing judges from considering future treatment prospects before designating an offender as dangerous? [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm by Kate Howard
Arizona 15-8366Issue: (1) What is the proper appellate procedure to address a trial court's failure to conduct the third Batson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:58 am by The Legal Blog
 (ii) Whether the court could, in an examination under Order 10 Rule 2 of the Code, confront a defendant with only the signature portion of a disputed unexhibited document filed by the plaintiff (by covering the remaining portions of the document) and require him to identify the seal/stamp and signature? [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 10:55 am by The Legal Blog
(ii) Whether the court could, in an examination under Order 10 Rule 2 of the Code, confront a defendant with only the signature portion of a disputed unexhibited document filed by the plaintiff (by covering the remaining portions of the document) and require him to identify the seal/stamp and signature? [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
This was insufficient to preserve the issue for appellate review, and the court therefore reviewed the jury instructions for plain error only. (2) The trial court did not err, plainly or otherwise, in failing to instruct on manslaughter or perfect self-defense. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 4:01 pm
(For those unfamiliar with the process in New York, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee would investigate and recommend sanctions for violations of the ethical rules, which would then be considered by the Appellate Division of Supreme Court. [read post]