Search for: "SSA Notice" Results 441 - 448 of 448
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2007, 5:49 pm
  In sum, employers who do not comply with the regulations will be considered to have “constructive notice” of the status of those unauthorized workers who were subjects of no-match letters and whose employment eligibility the employer failed to re-verify. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 11:38 am
The final rule includes slight revisions to the June 2006 proposed "safe harbor" protocol in relation to SSA no-match letters and DHS notices, most notably extending from 63 days to 93 days the period of time an employer has to complete reconciliation of information when there is a discrepancy, and promises immunity from a constructive knowledge charge premised on such notices should the employer follow the procedure exactly as stated. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 1:21 pm
The following list ofterms and acronyms, used in Child Support Enforcement cases, is found at Legal Help USA: Accrual Sum of child support payments that are due or overdue. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 9:42 am
Social Security POMS to Address Structured Settlements - S2KM first reported this announcement by the SSA's Ken Brown in an April 9, 2007 blog post titled: "Academy of Special Needs Planners". [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 1:53 pm
Griffin pursuant to a structured settlement agreement (SSA) signed in September 1993. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 3:26 am
We now so hold: because Binder was not a party in the proceedings before the SSA, it cannot avail itself of section 405(g).Normally, Section 405(h) channels all challenges that "arise under" the Act through the proper administrative proceedings by forbidding federal suits that have not been administratively reviewed first. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
Valerie Smith challenges the denial of disability insurance benefits to her by the Social Security Administration (SSA), contending that its decision neither complied with the treating source regulation nor was supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
10 Jul 2006, 2:18 pm
In affirming the information request violation, Chairman Battista and Member Schaumber relied specifically on the judge's finding that both the grievance filed by the Union's business agent, Charles Fogell, on April 23 and the phone discussion between Fogell and the Respondent's operations manager, Gary Shay, on April 22 would have put Shay on notice that the Union needed the requested information to confirm its belief that the contract had been violated. [read post]