Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF M. C., ET AL."
Results 441 - 460
of 523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Ranbaxy and AstraZeneca reach agreement in Esomeprazole patent litigation: (SmartBrief), (IPBiz), (Spicy IP), (Profitability through Simplicity), (IP Law360), (Philip Brooks), (GenericsWeb), Cadbury loses Australian battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law… [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 9:03 am
And that's exactly what happened with Ashcroft, Comey, Goldsmith, et al., when the President was prepared to adopt Addington's views rather than theirs, and to break the law contrary to their judgment. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
Furthermore, CIL is violated whenever a State, “as a matter of state policy,… practices, encourages or condones (a) genocide, (b) slavery… (c) the murder or causing the disappearance of individuals, (d) torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment… or (g) a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:44 pm
” (Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
(c) all counterclaims, cross-claims and third party claims; (d) all common law claims, based on contract, tort, fraud, or intentional torts; (e) all claims based on a violation of any state or federal constitution, statute or regulation; . . . [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 5:12 am
Skadden, Arps et al Sidley Auston LLP Time Warner US Department of State Debevoise & Plimpton National Amusements Inc. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Saving US innovation: more patent funding needed (IP Watchdog) BPAI backlog (Patently-O) Deadline to volunteer for the USPTO peer review pilot program is approaching (Patentably Defined) Check out the new beta test release of the USPTO’s website (Patentably Defined) (Just an Examiner) Second pair of eyes fails innovation in the US (IP Watchdog) USPTO needs improved workflow management (IP… [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Next Door Company, et al. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 11:55 am
” See Steven C. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:45 pm
The 1986 paper “The British Nationality Act as a logic program” (Sergot et al. 1986) describes how the existing word-based formula of the Act governing British citizenship used the techniques of a logic programming approach. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Advocacy A lawyer’s role is to pursue her client’s interests within the bounds of legality. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
United States, 290 U.S. 13, 16 (1933)); see United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:30 am
Falbe et al. (2016) used a repeated cross-sectional design comparing the pre- and post-changes in sweetened and unsweetened consumptions for different individuals. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
City of Los Angeles (Rony Shram, et al, Real Parties in Interest) (2023) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
Ho, Tom M. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:46 am
[C]ases in this area require a great deal of entanglement between the police and the private searcher before agency can be found. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law Symposium Sorry, guys, I did not follow the patent panels.Panel III: Trademarks Rebecca Tushnet, Fixing Incontestability: The Next FrontierIncontestability is a nearly unique feature of American trademark law, with a unique American implementation. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:02 pm
When consumers have not formed attitudes toward an issue, Kumkale et al.[14] stated that consumers used source credibility mainly to form attitudes and not to change them. [read post]
