Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF M. C., ET AL." Results 441 - 460 of 527
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am by stevemehta
STEVEN WYNER et al., Defendants and Respondents. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
Mud Buddy, LLC d/b/a Mud Buddy Manufacturing (Docket Report) District Court Utah: Post-motion correction of discovery deficiency warrants sanctions: CleanCut v Rug Doctor et al (Docket Report) District Court C D California answers: May an inventor previously employed by plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest serve as an expert for defendant? [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas finds Applied Medical Resources liable for infringement of Covidien’s surgical device patent (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas limits number of patent claims and prior art references asserted in case: SynQor, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Non-practising entity entitled to permanent injunction where infringed patent was the subject of prior exclusive license: Judkins v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
In the process, these changes have saved lives here in the United States and abroad, and prevented countless injuries. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
In particular, government should not censor Americans’ choice of content through open-ended public interest regulatory rationales.[7] C. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm by Martin George
One current example is the ongoing discussion about the Heidelberg Report2 which proposes to replace the so-called arbitration exception of Article 1 (2)(d) of the Brussels I Regulation (JR) by two new articles which shall address positively the interfaces between arbitration and the Regulation and strengthen arbitration within the European Judicial Area.3 The following article first delineates the background of the present discussion (II), than it briefly presents the proposals of the Heidelberg… [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 4:37 pm by Bill Marler
Fresh produce contaminated during cultivation, harvesting, processing, and distribution has also been a source of hepatitis A (Butot et al., 2008; Calder et al., 2003; Fiore, 2004; Hutin, et al., 1999; Wheeler, et al., 2005). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
I'm leaving it on the January 8 list for those interested in the briefs, but with the understanding that of course it will not be granted at conference tomorrow. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 10:45 am by charonqc
It appealed to me on this, my fifth  Blawg Review, to start with a welcome from the Baron Mandelson of Foy, Prince of Darkness,  First Secretary of State, Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills,  Lord President of The Council and Witch Finder-General for H M Government…. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP)   Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46)   Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v Unilever plc & Ors (IPKat)… [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
Only a few states allow retail stores or farmers’ markets to sell raw milk, while others restrict sales to on-farm purchases, or ban raw milk altogether (Oliver et al, 2009). [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:19 am
Here, too, Ms Pelosi et al have been disingenuous: the only reference to this issue in the bill is eligibility for federal tax credits. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm by Shannon Sims
---Community Development ClinicClass Unique #: 28930 Course #: 397C Instructor: Way Et Al. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
First, not all foodborne illnesses are reported to CDC as described by Mead et al (1999). [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The 14th Court of Appeals rejected all challenges against the arbitration award, the arbitration process, and the arbitrator, and affirmed the family court's order confirming the decision of the arbitrator - a former judge.M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O NIn this suit affecting the parent-child relationship, appellant, Lynn G., appeals from the trial court's order affirming a post-divorce arbitration award. [read post]