Search for: "STATE TAX COURTS JUDICIAL"
Results 441 - 460
of 5,034
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2014, 5:01 am
My recent post on the latest developments in the attempt by Philadelphia to subject lap dances to the amusement tax, Philadelphia Lap Dance Tax Effort Bumped Up to Court, Which Grinds It Down, inspired a reader to ask me if I had seen a recent story about the judicial decision treating strippers as employees for labor law purposes. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:04 am
Lex Machina plans to expand its state court coverage to a dozen U.S. state courts in 2020, including many major metropolitan areas. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
” The reference to tax should not fool anyone. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:48 am
Judicial issues first became regularly intertwined with presidential politics during the period between the 1890s and 1937, when the Supreme Court, along with lower federal courts and state courts, carefully scrutinized the constitutionality of social and economic regulatory legislation that was designed to ameliorate some of the harsher effects of the Industrial Revolution. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
AEP argument, Justice Breyer, setting up one of his classic hypotheticals, wanted to know why a judge should not impose a $20-a-ton carbon tax as a judicial remedy. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:24 pm
To make the most of this Supreme Court opinion, companies with offices in multiple states should carefully consider the state where they are incorporated and headquartered, and perhaps also consider as important factors both whether they are happy defending lawsuits and the tax implications of being there. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 12:30 am
In addition, it is recommended to clarify the exclusive jurisdiction of the IP Court by removing the potential overlap between the jurisdictions of the IP Court, the administrative courts and other state authorities, for example, by extending the jurisdiction of the Court to customs and tax disputes involving an IP element. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 2:02 pm
In line with several other states, the court replaced the “right to control” test, with the stringent “ABC” test. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 11:59 am
SB 2769 Authorizes collection of criminal court fines, costs and litigation taxes in same manner as civil debt. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 10:36 pm
Admittedly, even now, the decision has little to offer by way of direct judicial precedent in common law systems like India, especially when dealing with tax planning. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Republican Party leaders and President Trump’s legal team have gone to court to block implementation of California’s newly enacted law that denies ballot access to presidential candidates who have chosen not to release their tax returns. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 5:47 pm
United States, decided on October 18. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 5:47 pm
United States, decided on October 18. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 7:26 am
If you are denied a reduction but you still believe your home is over-assessed, New York allows judicial (court) review of the assessment. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
I only have so much time, so I’m going to do the state-wide judicial elections (Supreme, Commonwealth, and Superior Courts) and then the Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia, Montgomery, Bucks, Chester and Delaware Counties. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:00 am
On August 30, 2005,...IRS Federal Tax Liens in Bankruptcy Written by Craig D. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:13 am
(b) If we are talking about tax delegation, we should keep in mind delegation to the courts, not just to the Treasury Department. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:49 pm
(6) The petitioner may seek judicial review of a finalorder denying relief in the district court of appeal havingjurisdiction over the court that issued the order. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
Previous scholarly work has focused on the loss of the power in state courts, and has attributed the decline of judicial comment to a strict separation of functions between judge and jury and to regional differences in legal culture. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:54 pm
(David Kopel) So said the unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
