Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 441 - 460
of 17,215
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2009, 12:21 pm
Compare United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 4:00 pm
The dispute, Ritter v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:57 am
Third Circuit precedent, United States v Ketcham, 80 F.3d 789, 794 (3d Cir. 1996) required grouping of the production counts in this case. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:03 am
See, e.g., Ray v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 2:37 pm
In the Landmark cases -- known as People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:17 pm
United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 8:23 am
Have any suggestions for the 3 Count? [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
Have any suggestions for the 3 Count? [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 6:00 am
Under United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:37 am
State, 212 ... [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 5:40 pm
For more information about the NECC case and exhibits from the Cadden trial, visit the United States Attorney’s Office District of Massachusetts website: https://www.justice.gov/usao-ma/usa-v-cadden-et-al. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 10:39 am
Anderson, the Supreme Court unanimously held that states lack the unilateral power to exclude presidential candidates from the ballot on the basis… Continue reading The post “Administering Presidential Elections and Counting Electoral Votes After Trump v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:01 am
The State charged Ivan Johnson with two counts of indecency with a child. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 3:22 pm
App. 4th Vol 68 Johnson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
The order states that Brown is permitted continue to make statements and publish on topics not related to the counts on which he was indicted. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:51 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:51 am
The question in this case is whether, when a criminal death penalty trial is delayed due to the state’s failure to fund defense counsel, that delay should count against against the state in a subsequent “speedy trial” analysis. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:51 am
The question in this case is whether, when a criminal death penalty trial is delayed due to the state’s failure to fund defense counsel, that delay should count against against the state in a subsequent “speedy trial” analysis. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:25 pm
The post-Rivera decision of theUnited States Supreme Court in Cunningham v California, 549 US 270 [2007] suggests that Rivera might not be the last word on the constitutionality of the New York persistent sentencing law. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:58 pm
In a recent Florida case, Davila v. [read post]
