Search for: "STATE v. AMARAL"
Results 441 - 460
of 641
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The proposed lines dividing each of the six new states are provisional; under Draper’s proposal, over the next few years, any county that adjoins any of the proposed states can choose to become part of that contiguous state, provided that the counties that are provisionally in that neighboring state also agree to add such a county. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
For example, in the seminal case of United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
” A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Town of Greece v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
In particular, we argued that unlike prayers used to open legislative sessions at the state legislative level (one of which was upheld by the Supreme Court, largely on the basis of unbroken historical tradition, in Marsh v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:30 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm
The claim relates to a book by former police chief Goncalo Amaral. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we analyze an important and interesting decision, Demers v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 12:00 pm
Harrison relies instead on the unreviewable finality of congressional membership decisions and pressured state ratifications, Amar on congressional power to republicanize Southern states with black suffrage, and Colby on the normative desirability of an intergenerationally-authored Fourteenth Amendment including cases like Brown and Roe.Read more » [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
My biweekly column slot this week roughly coincides with the beginning of the new academic year at most law schools across the country. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 8:27 am
Smith and Akhil Amar). [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
That is why the Supreme Court’s failure to make clear the standard of review it was applying in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 8:54 am
Holder (voting rights), and United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 8:15 am
See New York v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Perry and United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
[United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:55 am
See Akhil Reed Amar, the Lawfulness of Section 5—and Thus of Section 5, 126 Harv. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
According to numerous press accounts, Clerks throughout the state have been doing exactly that since early July. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 12:04 am
After listening to the oral arguments in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:41 am
Amar, Vikram David Amar, Windsor v. [read post]
