Search for: "STATE v. ARNOLD" Results 441 - 460 of 1,497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2008, 11:07 am
On February 20, 2008, in an 8-1 decision, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Preston v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 2:48 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Homeland Security Investigations and US Attorneys' offices did just that in Operation Mummy's Curse, which involved the case of United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
 Moreover, there have been prominent cultural property cases featuring fakes, including the Arnold Peter Weiss case, where the convicted defendant possessed forged ancient coins, and the seminal case of U.S. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:26 am
A search by customs officers at an American airport, does not require reasonable suspicion, according to the Ninth Circuit in USA v Arnold. (4/21/2008). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
 In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:14 am by Joe Kristan
  Arnold Kling ponders the Hoover presidency: Price V. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:05 am
Lauri Rechardt got the ball rolling by suggesting that the time and money required to make such applications would mean that this did not happen, and in the copyright context, the record industry still regards these applications as being cases they cannot afford to lose, and so its battles are picked carefully and the work is done meticulously to ensure the result.Eleonora Rosati pointed out that Cartier is the first occasion on which an application for a website-blocking order against… [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:05 am
  The answer on novelty, according to Arnold J., is that the doctrine of equivalence does not apply. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 11:28 pm
Last week, this Kat published a post on the issue of trade mark registrations suffering from a lack of clarity [here] following the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 2:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Arnold is a Senior Director – Legal at the University of Texas/Texas A&M Investment Management Company (UTIMCO). [read post]