Search for: "STATE v. CLEMENTS"
Results 441 - 460
of 811
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2012, 6:30 am
Association v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:44 am
The Stolen Valor case, United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
But then a decision in the Eleventh Circuit upholding Judge Vincent and the skillful advocacy of Paul Clement shook my confidence – even after remarkable opinions by Judges Sutton and Silberman upholding the Act. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:42 am
by Clark Taylor In Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
Wallace, Jr.PartnerChair, Sports Law GroupThompson Coburn LLPThe conference has a number of distinguished speakers with sports law ties, including Paul Clement, who argued for the NFL in Brady v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:58 am
By V. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:19 am
Ingalls * Social Media Photos Foil Yet Another Litigant--Clement v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
Last week, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Clements v Clements. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:02 am
She asked the attorney representing the states challenging the law, Paul Clement, why couldn’t Congress raise everyone’s taxes to pay for health care and then give an exemption to those who already have health care? [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:46 am
Anywho, here’s a link to the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision released this morning: Clements v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am
The United States Olympic Committee (USOC) and Chicago 2016 v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am
Clement Stein, D2005-1201 (WIPO January 31, 2006) (Pending action in California state court) were dismissed at the Respondents’ requests. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am
The United States Olympic Committee (USOC) and Chicago 2016 v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 am
The United States Olympic Committee (USOC) and Chicago 2016 v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
But "Ohio State" has echoes of one of the key cases cited in support of the mandate: the 1942 decision in Wickard v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Beiswenger v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 am
United States, 10-cv-8435. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
Hopwood notes that Paul Clement’s use of the phrase “unprecedented and unbounded” in his brief for the ACA challengers echoes a phrase used by the Chief Justice in the Court’s opinion in United Haulers Association, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
A recent case, Dickerson v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:12 am
The panel was careful to say that its decision did not invalidate state marriage laws excluding same-sex couples because, in part, only the Supreme Court could do so under its own precedent in Baker v. [read post]