Search for: "STATE v. GEAR"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,257
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2017, 5:04 am
Miller v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Baker or Reno v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 1:52 pm
The infamous decision in the recent R. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 10:03 am
No companion bill in the state House has yet been filed. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:56 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 8:26 am
” In 2013, Trask blogged a related case, saying the court “stated that in Ashford Gear, ‘one of the plaintiff’s firms, Bock & Hatch, had lied to a witness about keeping a list of possible faxes and recipients confidential.'” Bock & Hatch sued for defamation and violations of Illinois unfair competition law. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:47 am
A contract signed by only one party is not enforceable if the negotiations between the parties indicate that they have no intention of being bound until all of the terms of the agreement are incorporated into a written contract to be signed by both parties.[5] A typical example is a situation where the parties orally negotiate the basic terms of an agreement but state that they want to have their managers or lawyers draft a formal, written document that both parties will sign. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 12:09 pm
Miller v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 12:09 pm
Miller v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 7:49 am
Under the Fourth Circuit’s two-step analysis of joint employment under the FLSA in Schultz v. [read post]
21 Jan 2017, 9:02 am
That is, essentially, the conclusion of the Ohio Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2017, 9:02 am
That is, essentially, the conclusion of the Ohio Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:40 am
The employer objected to class certification on a host of grounds, including that the variations in protective gear, the differences in the time to don and doff the gear, and the varying hours worked gave rise to individualized issues precluding class certification. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 11:11 am
In the Tyson case, the employees claimed they weren’t paid for the time it took to perform tasks like putting on or taking off protective gear. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 11:11 am
In the Tyson case, the employees claimed they weren’t paid for the time it took to perform tasks like putting on or taking off protective gear. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm
"The panel then shifted gears to discuss the costs, and possible benefits, of disuniformity among state IP laws, and the prospect of federalization.Disarray in the right of publicity Jennifer discussed the remarkable diversity among state rights of publicity. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:58 am
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 7:33 am
Daugherty shifted the car into gear and sped away. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 7:33 am
Daugherty shifted the car into gear and sped away. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 12:00 am
The Fourth District Court of Appeal held in Ober v. [read post]
