Search for: "STATE v. KEEN"
Results 441 - 460
of 906
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm
” (Judicial Watch, through separate litigation (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:38 pm
Justice Breyer was particularly keen on this, and suggested at one point that maybe the Court could rule that this particular level of surveillance certainly crossed the line and required a warrant, and leave it to Congress and the legislatures of the states to draw the line about the particular circumstances in which warrants would be required in other instances.The traditional liberal/conservative split on the Court might break down on this issue, as it did in Kyllo v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:00 am
State v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:00 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:13 pm
Supreme Court’s decision next term in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:55 am
Supreme Court ruling in Frye v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 15 December 2017 Chaney J handed down judgment in the case of Rayney v State of Western Australia [2017] WASC 367. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
At Keen News Service, Lisa Keen looks at where the five “stand on LGBT-related concerns. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 1:15 am
And yes, Swiss IP practitioners take a keen interest in developments in European IP law, despite Switzerland not being a member state of the EU).The morning was entirely dedicated to patent law. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:54 am
For those keen to see Zhu suffer further, the Court of Appeal in The Hague then went on to consider, obiter, what the position would have been had Zhu’s use for export in fact constituted sufficient use to support a bad faith claim. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 5:00 pm
In Bush v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:44 pm
Rutherford & Ors v Secretary of State for Work And Pensions [2014] EWHC 1613 (Admin) This was the Judicial Review, supported by CPAG, of the failure of the bedroom tax regulations to address the position of tenants where a bedroom was needed for overnight carers for a child. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm
This week also brought ‘Fisting’ to the fore on twitter: Obscenity trial – the law is not suitable for a digital age Myles Jackman in the Guardian: “I welcome the jury’s verdict but the OPA means the state is still capable of acting as a voyeur in the bedroom” I need not trouble you with the facts of R v Peacock. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 1:32 am
As Amazon is not to be seen under items I to V, Amazon does not fall under vi. [read post]
7 May 2010, 7:02 am
Pyett, and Gross v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
While the former course is undoubtedly preferable, past events in the United States and beyond make it crystal clear that both are possible. [read post]
