Search for: "STATE v. LAWRENCE" Results 441 - 460 of 3,374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2016, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a bank-fraud case, rejecting Lawrence Shaw’s argument that he could not be found liable under the federal bank-fraud statute if he only intended to defraud a third party, not the bank itself, and remanding for consideration of questions about the jury instructions. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 11:52 pm
Lawrence, The ICJ Whaling Case: Missed Opportunity to Advance the Rule of Law in Resolving Science-Related Disputes in Global Commons? [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:31 am by Dennis Crouch
[Link] Supreme Court will hear Global-Tech Appliance v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on the same day there was a consequentials hearing in the case of Baroness Lawrence and ors v Associated Newspapers before Nicklin J. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am by Michael C. Dorf
It then also notes that the plaintiffs and the United States as amicus had connected the abortion right to the right of consenting adults to engage in same-sex sexual conduct (recognized in Lawrence v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:38 am by tracey
Cout of Appeal (Civil Division) Meares v Medway Primary Care Trust [2011] EWCA Civ 897 (28 July 2011) Greyfort Properties Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 908 (28 July 2011) Lait v Evening Standard Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 859 (28 July 2011) O, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham [2011] EWCA Civ 925 (28 July 2011) St Helens & Knowsley Hospitals NHS Trust v Brownbill & Ors… [read post]
23 May 2008, 7:28 am
DEP'T OF THE AIR FORCE "(U.S. 9th Cir., May 21, 2008) - In a suit brought against the Air Force challenging the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' (DADT) policy after plaintiff was suspended from duty as an Air Force reservist nurse because of her sexual relationship with a civilian woman, dismissal of the suit for failure to state a claim is reversed in part where: 1) the DADT, after Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 12:52 pm
Lord Justice Lawrence Collins concurred, but Lord Justice Wall dissented: "In my judgment," he stated, "...it seems to me clear that the fundamental assumption behind the agreement, and critical to the making of the order, was the assumption that Mrs. [read post]