Search for: "STATE v. TAYLOR" Results 441 - 460 of 3,352
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2011, 10:00 am by Record on Appeal
 The court made it clear that even under Baker & Taylor, an in-state purchaser who uses goods in this State is subject to the excise use tax. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 2:54 am
Taylor III, Respondent (FINRA AWC)Supreme Court Denies Defendants’ Challenge to CFTC’s Enforcement AuthorityUS Supreme Court Says "Bookings.com" Is Not An Ineligible Generic Name Per Federal Trademark United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Sheldon Toplitt
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Laura Taylor Swain this week in John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 10:30 am by Giles Peaker
Taylor v Slough Borough Council (2020) EWHC 3520 (Ch) An appeal on the issue of whether a Council landlord’s initial failure to have regard to the Public Sector Equality Duty on commencing possession proceedings could be remedied by later performance of that duty. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:50 am
Summary of Decision issued March 6, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Taylor v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* In Matter of Port Washington Union Free School Dist. v Port Washington Teachers Assn, 268 AD2d 523, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Blackburne, 87 N.Y.2d 660, observed that a statute, decisional law or public policy may preclude referring a Taylor Law contract dispute to arbitration,. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
* In Matter of Port Washington Union Free School Dist. v Port Washington Teachers Assn, 268 AD2d 523, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Blackburne, 87 N.Y.2d 660, observed that a statute, decisional law or public policy may preclude referring a Taylor Law contract dispute to arbitration,. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 4:51 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]No. 07-5439 _________________________________ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________________________ RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:01 pm by James Romoser
ShareMind-reading police officers, guns made of marshmallows, and a Woody Allen mockumentary all made rhetorical appearances during Tuesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:54 am
Interpreting contract language Local 589 v Cuevas, 271 AD2d 535 Using clear and unambiguous language in a collective bargaining agreement makes it easier for a court to resolve the meaning of a Taylor Law contract provision. [read post]