Search for: "STATE v. WOODS"
Results 441 - 460
of 3,001
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2020, 6:15 am
See Vera v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 1:57 pm
The DOL has stated that it intended the Final Rule to provide clarity by casting a uniform joint employment standard to avoid disparate interpretations by circuit courts throughout the country. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 11:30 am
” The lawsuit, New York et al. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 2:59 pm
See State Farm v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am
Twenty years later, in Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] 2 AC 1, the Court of Appeal purportedly (in the words of the Supreme Court yesterday) followed the Prudential decision, reiterating the Foss v Harbottle rule and holding that a shareholder cannot sue for the recovery of a diminution in the value of his shares or in distributions, where that loss flows from loss suffered by the company and that company has a cause of action to recover… [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 1:45 am
Frank Petro has received the highest rating (A/V) from Martindale-Hubbell, the world’s foremost authority on law firm credentials. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
” Tullis v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 2:07 am
In Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:15 am
• Lester V. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:09 pm
Wade, the defeat of the Bork nomination, Bush v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:51 am
And, unlike a piece of carved wood that lays bare the work of a knife’s whittling, when the object of abuse is a human being, layers of shame, fear, and trauma often obscure the imprint of mental and physical abuse. ... [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:00 am
Bonness v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:49 pm
Regarding which documents must be produced for each category’s stated purpose, he said they must be “essential and sufficient to [its] stated purpose. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 9:53 am
Knasiak, July 23, 2020, Wood, D.). [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:10 am
The CAFC's order (pdf here) states, rather cryptically:The case is remanded for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decision. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 8:52 am
McGucken v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
We had a post by Lorna Woods The ICO issued a statement about the decision, as did EDPS, EDPB and CNIL. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
The destination state may, for example, have an ‘adequacy decision’ that means that the state in question ensures an adequate (roughly equivalent) level of protection to the ensured by the GDPR (Article 45 GDPR). [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 4:13 pm
In Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:24 am
Quoting Pannu v. [read post]
