Search for: "Sanchez, Appeal of" Results 441 - 460 of 742
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2012, 11:11 am by JakeMcGowan
As Julian Sanchez pointed out on the Cato@Liberty blog, the Supreme Court held in Katz v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:07 pm
The convictions must be upheld as there was no Fourth Amendment violation, and Skinner’s other arguments on appeal lack merit. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 12:00 pm by David Oscar Markus
“She is very Cleopatra-ish, like the Queen of the Nile,” said Miami criminal defense attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez, who represented two other defendants in the same case. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:22 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
(She also sued under the Alien Tort Claims Act, alleging that Sanchez was abusive, but the Court of Appeals rejects that claim).The Court of Appeals evidently has not resolved a case like this. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The Supreme Court may have lost interest in taking up additional post-Concepcion cases, now that it has granted review in Sanchez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 11:28 am by Eric
Fortunately, Julian Sanchez has said some of the things I was thinking, so I encourage you to read his post as well. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:23 am by Rekha Arulanantham
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit dismissed a challenge to Kansas’ tuition equality law. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:17 pm by Lara
 Appeals to personal health are hugely important to many people and can serves as an effective motivator for them. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:50 am
On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) found that there was probable cause to support the prosecution of the defendant for causing the death of the victim, Edgar Sanchez, and (2) concluded that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the defendant's conviction for murder as either a principal or accessory. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 12:30 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  Yesterday, the Federal Appeals Court declared what we've always known to be true: that the so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is an unconstitutional assault on our civil liberties. [read post]